I grew up in a rural village
complete with all you would expect from this pastoral idyll; tousled hedgerows,
dense cool woods, a riverbank, warm baked hay during the baling season, wild
flowers thriving in meadows and my parent’s own fragrant garden. I also
remember of course the abundant cow pats, the stench of our neighbour’s vile
chrysanthemum filled industrial greenhouse and my friend’s terrifying turkey
cabin so it wasn’t entirely beautiful. I do think however, that this mass of
supersized smells probably initiated my curiosity with scent.
Perhaps my favourite scented memory
is the beguiling but slightly lewd smell of the pretty white flowers of
hawthorn hedges. They were at once startlingly rich, sweet and opulent but also
tended to make me check my trainers (or more frequently, rollerboots) for
traces of the numerous animal effluences that graced the country lanes.
The white floral is my least
favourite genre. I have tried hard to love classics such as Robert Piguet’s
Fracas or La
Chasse aux Papillons by L Artisan Parfumeur but a proliferation of
Tuberose and Jasmine brings about an extraordinarily queasy response. I
appreciate the importance of these notes and indeed the orange blossom, in
particular, the manner in which they play a crucial supporting role in so many
pleasing fragrances. However, when they play a leading role, my nose withers in
distaste at the indolic fetidity.
For
me, I need an alternative take on the white flower, one which either surprises
me with a quirky note combination or seduces me with the offer of a true
replication of nature.
One perfume that replicates the
white flower in nature is Trish McEvoy’s Gardenia Musk No 4. This is about as
‘putrid voluptuousness’ as it gets and is perhaps the sexiest fragrance in my
collection. By ‘sexy’, I mean ‘come hither’ in the way that hawthorn or
honeysuckle smells when warmed by the sun. With their pallid ghostly petals
playing second fiddle to the other brightly coloured blooms in the garden, they
need to release an almighty fertile stench to attract the bees.
I don’t recall the aroma of a
gardenia flower, nor have I ever sniffed an isolated synthetic molecule that
replicates it but my sense of ‘gardenia’ within perfumery is that of a lactonic
floral, a slightly honeyed milky sweetness with absolutely no sharp edges. In
that way it is to flowers what sandalwood is to wood. That’s exactly what you
get with Gardenia Musk – a creamy, musky, rounded scent with a slight
suggestion of honey and the warmth of a teeny bit of wood. I smell a highly
realistic and decadent note of honeysuckle at night, captivating, as I’ve yet
to smell another honeysuckle fragrance that does not smell of pound shop
shampoo.
In contrast to an aldehyde laced floral,
it feels like it contains no top notes and certainly no screechy aspects, as in
numerous harsh floral compositions. I think the ‘sexy’ aspect is amplified by
the fact that it’s almost drowsy. With no vivacious top notes to make it
sparkle it is literally pleading to go to bed.
It’s white floral opposite is Miller
Harris’s magnificent La Pluie, translating as ‘the rain’. Miller Harris describe
the heart of this fragrance as ‘wet white flowers’, hence it’s name. The
‘wetness’ is increased by an abundance of vetiver, adding a grassy tropical
forest vibe.
I wore my sample several times
before I could write about it. Why? Because it’s so multi-faceted, as complex
and surprising as Gardenia Musk is simplistic. It is most definitely gender neutral
and I imagine it would appeal to others who also find white florals generally
sickly.
The most curious aspect of this fume
is that it seems to wear ‘backwards’. Vanilla bourbon and vetiver bourbon
appear at the top of the composition instead of at the drydown where you would
expect them to nestle. The vanilla is ‘pure’ vanilla in that is lacks sugary
connotations, hoorah for Miller Harris! Instead, it reminds me a little of
Shalimar in that there is a very adult smoky and leathery sensation to the
vanilla/vetiver combination. Bergamot and tangerine seep in to add a little
citrusy sparkle, again with a distinct nod to Shalimar EDT/EDC formulations.
Soon into it’s wear the ‘wet white
flower’ heart transforms the smoky beginning into an exotic island floral interpretation.
Jasmine and ylang ylang combine in a fresh partnership, ‘lifting’ the
experience. The heady quality of jasmine is tempered by the sharpness of ylang
(think of ylang as having the same euphoric effect as citrus). Both of these
notes play out with subtlety, contributing rather than dominating. I feel that
Miller Harris has a link across it’s fumes in that a number share a herbal,
aromatic and soapy theme. La Pluie has this in buckets, a relief for me as I
adore the way that the camphorous lavender is used to offset what could
otherwise be too floral, bringing a little herbal integrity (nature at it’s
most authentic) to every stage of it’s wear.
My mission to discover more
alternative takes on the genre is ongoing. Therefore I’d love to hear your
comments or suggestions about others that might surprise me. Or indeed your
opinions of the fumes featured in this article.
I am giving away a sample of
Gardenia Musk No 4 to a commenter drawn at random. To enter, simply leave a
comment below and I’ll draw a winner at the end of June. Sadly It’s only safe
to post it within the UK due to our Royal Mail postal restrictions, however EU
commenters are welcome to enter but be aware that your sample might be end up
being worn by a customs official!
Ive tried a few florals but never found one i liked or didnt seem too feminine.The musk no 4 might just be the one
ReplyDeleteHi Alan, The Gardenia Musk is really feminine, though I'm sure you'd enjoy smelling it. I'd look to La Pluie for a man friendly floral. You'll recognise a little Shalimar/Dior Homme in there. It smelt stunning on my partner who's skin liked the vetiver note very much. I wish I had more of my sample left, I adored it!
ReplyDeleteHave you tried Jasmin et Cigarette? Now that's one white floral with an off note that makes it really interesting! :)
ReplyDeleteAh yes, great comment. I bought the multi sample pack. That really was an olfactory shock, I agree on the 'interesting' but I found it terrifyingly unpleasant. It does smell exactly of Jasmine and cigarettes doesn't it? And I'm a smoker!
ReplyDeleteI see now what you meant. :) Sounds great.
ReplyDeleteAnd for some reason it sounds to me like it would be a cheaper way to come close to JAR's Bolt of Lightning type of perfume...